WinVerifyTrust update will be mandatory for WSUS


Good morning folks,


 


A couple of weeks ago, I posted about Windows Vista Service Pack 1’s availability to WSUS. In that post, we mentioned that you should install the WinVerifyTrust update (KB 938759) if you are running your WSUS server on a Windows 2003 server to prevent Windows Vista SP1 from being continually re-downloaded to the server once the service pack is released to WSUS. 


 


Today, we’d like to let you know that, in order to make sure all customers are well protected, we will be marking this particular update as mandatory, which means it will appear in the Updates/WSUS Updates node of the Admin console, and will be auto-approved by default (since the “Advanced/WSUS Updates” checkbox is checked by default in Options/Automatic Approvals).


 


After this update has been marked as mandatory to WSUS for a short period of time, we will release Windows Vista Service Pack 1 to WSUS. We believe that this change will help make sure all customers have a good experience once SP1 is released to WSUS, and will also ensure that WSUS can be used to deploy other large updates we may release in the future.


 


Thank you for your support.


 


Cecilia Cole


WSUS Program Manager

Comments (32)

  1. Anonymous says:

    Vista sp1 on WSUS Ready or not..here comes Vista sp1 hitting our WSUS boxes today…YOU SHOULD HAVE the

  2. Anonymous says:

    If you are running Update Services in SBS 2003 R2 or just WSUS on any versions of SBS 2003, the WinVerifyTrust

  3. Anonymous says:

    Brilliant article, the batch file resolved this annoying issue, thank you a lot!

  4. Anonymous says:

    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 105 blogs have new articles in the past 30 days. 641 new articles

  5. Anonymous says:

    Over on the WSUS Product Team blog Cecilia Cole just posted about how the WinVerifyTrust update will

  6. Anonymous says:

    Kudos, good idea.  I could just see the wsus newsgroup filling up already had you not done this 😉

  7. Anonymous says:

    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 105 blogs have new articles in the past 30 days. 641 new articles

  8. Anonymous says:

    In case you don't read the WSUS Team Blog (you should by the way), there is a rather ominous posting

  9. Mark Morowczynski says:

    Is this updated forced out to ALL instances of WSUS3 regardless of what updates they sync up with? If my WSUS3 doesn’t actually have any Vista clients connecting to it so those updates aren’t being synced will this update still be forced out to me?

  10. YourWay says:

    July 7th and still no Vista SP1 on my WSUS… is that correct or something’s wrong here?

  11. dnix says:

    Ditto on the no vista sp1 on my wsus server as well…team here is becoming irritated and threatening to use a custom package via sccm – but I would prefer to use wsus!

  12. ламинат says:

    rsr Een plaatje zegt alles, toch ? sys  Het volledige rapport is hier te vinden. Lees natuurlijk i  de blogposting. y e

    Thanks for interesting post! lfy

    [url=http://skuper.ru]ламинат и паркет[/url] 0w

  13. сайдинг says:

    1qThank’s.6m I compleatly disagree with last post .

    <a href="http://all-siding.ru/index.php?section_id=129">обшивка сайдингом</a> 7i

    <a href="http://all-siding.ru/index.php?section_id=74">металлический сайдинг</a> 6c

  14. cizgi film says:

    If my WSUS3 doesn’t actually have any Vista clients connecting to it so those updates aren’t being synced will this update still be forced out to me?

  15. muzik dinle says:

    WSUS… is that correct or something’s wrong here?

  16. hepsi dinle says:

    being synced will this update still be forced out to me?

  17. gelinlikler says:

    If my WSUS3 doesn’t actually have any Vista clients connecting to it so those updates aren’t being synced will this update still be forced out to me?

  18. belgesel says:

    actually have any Vista clients connecting to it so those updates aren’t being synced will this update still be forced

  19. gelinlikler says:

    WSUS server on a Windows 2003 server to prevents Windows Vista SP1 from being continually re-downloaded to the server once the service packs is released to WSUS thanks

  20. havuz says:

    After this updates has been marked as mandatorys to WSUS for a shorts thanks

  21. Havuz says:

    Windows Vista Service Packs 1 to WSUS very good web page thanks

  22. ilahi dinle says:

    becoming irritateds and threatenings to use a customs packages via sccm very good

  23. Mercedes Yedek Parçaları says:

    Admin console, and will be auto-approveds by defaults (since the “Advanced/WSUS Update” checkbox is checkeds thanks very nice

  24. BAttERY says:

     http://www.batteryfast.co.uk/asus/a31-s5-002-battery.php Battery For ASUS A31-S5 A32-S5 S52N S5000 S5200N S5N white laptop battery,

     http://www.batteryfast.co.uk/asus/90-n851b1100-battery.php Battery For ASUS L3 L3D L3000 L3400 L3500 L3800 A42-M2 laptop battery,

  25. sohbet odaları says:

    thnaks <a href="http://www.trstar.net&quot; title="chat sohbet, sohbet odalari">sohbet chat</a> sites no spam 😀

  26. karot says:

    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 105 blogs have new articles in the past 30 days. 641 new articles

  27. kartvizit says:

    Admin console, and will be auto-approveds by defaults (since the “Advanced/WSUS Update” checkbox is checkeds thanks very nice

  28. medyum says:

    becoming irritateds and threatenings to use a customs packages via sccm very good

  29. komik videolar says:

    becoming irritateds and threatenings to use a customs packages via sccm very good

  30. tatil otelleri says:

    becoming irritateds and threatenings to use a customs packages via sccm very good

  31. Tatil Yerleri says:

    I am following your site for a long time.We have visitors, write effective articles.Thank you all for your effort.

    My English is not very good grammar errors may occur.

    http://tatilyerlerix.com