EHLO Again! The Exchange Team Blog Defined

Update 3/5/2014: Added a note about anonymous comment moderation.

It’s been a while since we posted something related to intent and operation of this blog. Since our first post in 2004, we have worked hard to give you the latest news and upcoming details about various versions of Exchange that were “new” and “in-market” at the time. Yup, some of us have been with the blog from day one.

First and foremost, this blog is the official blog of the Exchange Product Group (the “Exchange Team”). This is the same team of program managers, developers, testers, and other engineers at Microsoft that build Exchange for both on-premises releases and for Exchange Online/Office 365. In many respects, one could think of this scenario as us creating one product and then shipping different product SKUs. While this is a bit of an oversimplification, think of it as a single code base that gets shipped to different customers in different ways. We went into some detail around explaining how this process works in our Servicing Exchange 2013 post(one of the crucial points being that the speed of innovation/engineering).

Please note that this post is not about the benefits or challenges of choosing one approach to deploying Exchange over the other. Suffice it to say that there are many different considerations organizations go through when deciding what the right approach is for them. We understand this diversity is here to stay, hence our recent post about The Road Ahead.

We Listen and Respond to Your Feedback

As always, we listen to and consider all customer feedback. It’s clear from the comments from readers of this blog that some of you feel that we are trying to deliberately push more Service-related content, with the ultimate motive being “to get everyone to Exchange Online.” And you’ve said that you want more “Exchange Team” and fewer “Office 365 Team” blog posts.

Since from engineering viewpoint, there is no difference, we plan to continue sharing engineering advancements with you about it all on this blog. Restricting this blog to on-premises content simply does not make sense, given the diversity of our customer base (on-premises, Exchange Online, hybrid mode, etc.).

Thus, in response to your feedback, we've created an On premises tag for all posts that are related to on-premises subjects, allowing you to readily view only on-premises content. Please know that if you only follow on-premises content, you might miss out on early views of product features delivered to Exchange Online first, and include those features in future on-premises releases or updates as appropriate (Rajesh’s post Development cadence in a cloud world reflects this). We believe this approach is the best way to provide a single location for all things Exchange while providing you the choice to select the types of content you feel is appropriate to your current situation. To be really clear: if a specific post applies to both on-premises as well as Exchange Online, it would be tagged as both.

A note about post comments

For a while now, we've been considering turning off anonymous comments. It has become a bit of a necessity to go through comments posted over a typical weekend and clean off the inevitable (and creative!) comment spam. While already making tweaks to the blog, we've decided we will turn off anonymous commenting on March 1st. That will give you a bit of time to register with TechNet and keep giving us feedback, and will give us a way to keep the blog comments free of those “special offers” much easier.

Note: We have turned on anonymous comment moderation starting today (3/5/14). If you're not signed in, you will still see the comment form but comments will go into the moderation queue automatically. We do not plan to actively monitor this queue. Please register, and let us know if any issues!

We commit to keep sharing relevant content with all of you, no matter which combination of our products you are using (and even if you’re not using them <g>).

Nino Bilic

Comments (60)
  1. Nino Bilic says:

    @Dear Microsoft: the forums in question are here (look for deployment forums for your version). However, as Bharat mentioned, you are welcome to post comments here still. In fact the same account should work for both places. :) That being said – if things need investigation and back and forth communication, blog comments are not the most ideal way to do that so depending on what it is, our forums might be a better place for the discussion anyway.

  2. Nino Bilic says:

    @pesos – can you please email me the name of your TechNet account? I’ll have someone look into this. ninobATmicrosoft DOT com

  3. Anonymous says:

    @Bill: You'll need a TechNet profile.

  4. Nino Bilic says:

    @Spammer use Technet profiles – well, truth is that there is no perfect solution to this problem, you are correct. It raises the bar just a little higher though and allows us a way to block obvious spamming accounts. While it will not be perfect, it sure
    will be an improvement over today’s situation. Life is full of those situations: I know that locking my front door will not stop someone who REALLY wants to get in, but I’ll still lock it.

  5. Nino Bilic says:

    @Rhys: Ah yes, thanks for bringing that up… I believe that – during close to 10 years now that we have been running this blog – it is clear that we are not afraid of leaving what could be perceived as "negative comments" on our blog posts. In fact, it
    is all still out there. Also, I can assure you that not all negative comments are posted anonymously. Either way, we have been quite consistent to take the feedback received where it needs to go and do not remove any "negative" comments UNLESS they were explicitly
    offensive or personally insulting to our writers (there were just a few over the years that I personally nuked). That being said – registration with TechNet does not apply any sort of filter to comments, and if you feel that we deserve bad feedback, you will
    be at liberty to post it still. You could try it right now if you wanted. :)

  6. Nino Bilic says:

    @Joe, Patel, Adam… I want to make sure this is understood: we are absolutely not "killing comments". We are, however, planning to turn off Anonymous commenting, which today does get abused quite a bit by people running scripts etc. against our blog.
    We want to have the conversation, and commenting is here to stay. *Personally* speaking, I was never deterred from registering with a blog site or a forum if I really wanted to comment or participate in. I’d like to understand if there is a deficiency in the
    platform or some other platform issue that people might be worried about and would opt to not register? I do not believe that TechNet requires huge amount of personal information. Is there something else? You can use the same ID as on our TechNet forums. Thank

  7. Nino Bilic says:

    @pesos – thanks for mentioning this… do you mind emailing me with case details? I was actually involved in some discussions around this and want to follow up with the team involved. Ninob AT Microsoft DOT com

  8. Eddy1968 says:

    In the moment many customers are think about, that the product Microsoft Exchange "On-Premisiss" will have no future for a long time. Could you may told something about that to show them that everything is all right? (Yes I kwow you have sent a out a route
    plan in the last weeks)

  9. Re: anon comments as long as the login is easy and consistent (MS/Live ID), who the hell cares about needing to log in? it takes all of about 10 seconds (since I *just* did so, to make the point). Also, I agree w/ your decisions about content and on-prem
    vs hosted… though I’d probably have tags for more than just On-Prem (you may already… I notice "Exchange Online" in this article’s tags)… it’s probably also be good to check whether the RSS feeds can include tag filters.

  10. You’re making me hungry, Ron J. Can I come to the party too? Mmmm ice cream.

  11. EHLO Again! The Exchange Team Blog Defined
    thank you

  12. Anonymous says:

    @Dear Microsoft: As indicated in the post and comment responses, only anonymous comments will be disabled. You'll still be able to follow comments (and post comments after signing in to TechNet). As comments on this and other posts show, we don't remove, edit or moderate comments, including any negative ones, unless they're spam or use inappropriate/abusive language.

  13. Good to know we have a tag for the upcoming Exchange 2013 SP1 post. :)

  14. ABCFED says:

    ROFLOL. I see a HUGE wave of new subscribers coming on in the next month. That’s pretty much going to be the result of not allowing anonymous comments. People will just create bogus e-mails ( allows 5), and then just post anyway. So kudos for
    effort, but…I suspect we’ll continue to see people wanting more information about the NSA and security problems with the cloud, On-Premises people getting their panties in a bunch over Exchange Online being promoted first, and more complaints than you can
    shake a stick at over the poor quality and bugs in the product.

    Oh, wait. Those are all my complaints as well too. At least you are tagging the articles for On-Premises versus On-Cloud after more than a year of people asking for that feature.

    Anyway, good luck with your stopping anonymous comments….and congratulations on all your new subscribers you will get out of this effort.


  15. Anonymous says:

    I’m trying to get some assistance with the remove direct booking script referenced on
    but I can’t submit any comments on the pages that describe the script’s functions.

    Any suggestions about how to get a couple of questions answered?

  16. Tim says:

    That’s all great but it would be good if you could stop making promises you can’t keep… "SP1 will be released early 2014". Yes we want to know if possible in advance when a release might be happening, but make sure you over estimate a date and define
    what ‘early 2014’ means to you.

  17. Finally says:

    Thank you for listening. I look forward to more on-prem articles being able to filter out the cloud-only ones.

  18. bill says:

    "Exchange On-Premises" tag is a good idea., but Please give us deep dive Exchange On-Premises articles. What you mean "we’ve decided we will turn off anonymous commenting on March 1st."?? Does that mean I have to write my name such as now?? or I must have
    TechNet account??

  19. Ron J says:

    Yes! I am so happy I do not have to read about Office 365 anymore. I’m going to buy cake and iccd cream and throw myself a party for our IT staff. Thank you! Thank you! THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS CHANGE!

  20. Joe says:

    @Bharat Suneja [MSFT – Why?? feels like you guys do NOT want comments. These Comments were they ONLY Communication Bridge we had & now we all MUST have TechNet profile, Bad idea………

  21. Do NOT kill comments....... says:

    This is the best site for the Exchange Server that I have seen, Exchange Team & Exchange Admins freely comments………DO NOT KILL COMMNETS……..

  22. Patel says:


  23. adam says:

    Do NOT kill Comments.

  24. lee says:

    Do NOT kill Comments. Comments are a good way to talk to you (Exchange Team).

  25. Rhys says:

    "We’ve got a problem, theres hundreds of negative comments regarding Exchange 2013 being an unusable rush job" "Turn off comments, that’ll fix the problem" You need to answer questions, not ignore more of them.

  26. Joe says:

    @Nino Bilic – DO NOT KILL anonymous COMMENTS.

  27. Patel says:

    Yep, DO NOT KILL anonymous COMMENTS.

  28. bill says:


  29. axel says:

    @Nino Bilic – It is VERY clear that you guys are Killing "anonymous COMMENTS", Because you DO NOT like negative comments. But these Negative Comments made MS improve Windows 8 > Windows 8.1 with Start Button. Also the Negative comments here, made you guys
    create the "On-Premises" tags. So Please do NOT kill anonymous COMMENTS.

  30. adam says:

    Please DO NOT KILL anonymous COMMENTS……Keep the democracy here :-)

  31. Jay R. says:

    HATE Office 365. HATE it being pushed down my throat. HATE how you guys are now obviously prioritizing features for 365 vs on-premise. HATE how it’s become about the bottom line rather than what your customers want (service revenue>>on-premise revenue),
    and HATE the fact that us dedicated, experienced Exchange admins that have worked with the product since 5.5 are slowly being given the middle finger as we are coaxed into 365 cloud and it’s Fisher Price interface..

  32. TimnotMcmichael says:

    Tim what part of "SP1 will be released early 2014" don’t you understand:) we just started 2014 for f sake:) if u eager for sp1 just install sp3 for ex2010:)

  33. CakeLover says:

    Don’t kill cake!

  34. Dictatorship vs. Democracy says:

    Dictatorship = No More Anonymous Comments VS. Democracy = All comments are welcome + Anonymous comments

  35. justin says:

    Ironically these comments prove why anonymous commenting needs to go away…

  36. Steve says:

    Wow Exchange team, if you had to deal with this kinds of comments (does that pass for discussion?) then yes… Go ahead and turn off anonymous comments so we can have a discussion.

  37. Dear Microsoft: says:

    Be aware that many times we patching admins can follow release issues because of the posting of the comments. There isn’t a place clearly designated as a follow up location for post release issues. Instead people post here. Perhaps ensuring that there
    is a dedicated forum with truly dedicated eyeballs watching for issues might be a middle ground?

  38. @pesos says:

    Happy to register and look forward to increased interaction between registered users and the team. Maybe then someone will provide a proper answer as I am very concerned that we are being pushed into an unsupported state. We were just told by PSS that
    "The product team is aware of with this DCR request for Exchange 2013 CU3. However, they won’t fix it since the business impact is very minimum with acceptable work around (using adsiedit.msc) and cost/risk of fix is high" Seeing as how the change in the gui
    to restrict the number of auto attendant transfer digits to the number of digits in the dial plan extensions was JUST INTRODUCED in CU3, I fail to see how the cost/risk of the fix is high. If it was, the team would not have introduced this useless and aesthetic
    change in the first place! We have been told that the team has suggested using ADSIEDIT to directly edit the XML file that controls the auto attendant settings. If the team and PSS expect us to accept the adsiedit workaround as a legitimate, long-term solution
    to this issue, then we would appreciate an official statement from both PSS and the Exchange team explicitly stating that the adsiedit method is the recommend AND SUPPORTED method to deal with this issue. Thank you, Wes

  39. Goodbye says:

    Will be pretty quiet here. Mission accomplished.

  40. Matt says:

    Sorry guys but Exchange 2013 has been a massive flop from my perspective. I have worked with Exchange as an integrator/consultant for 10+ years and I have had 1 customer that is serious abut upgrading to 2013. The rest dont see any reason to move from
    2010 as they see 2013 as an absolute mess. I think that focusing LESS on O365 development of Exchange and more on on-prem for the next release. Please start releasing things when they are ready not when you have to, that is the perception from my clients,
    they would rather wait for a release (CU, SP, full version) than to have a rushed buggy release. The only time I see Exchange servers at the moment is when I deploy a 2010 UM server for Lync and 60% of my work load was Exchange consulting and deployment.

  41. Dear Nino says:

    I don’t disagree that blog comments are not the way to track issues, but face it that’s the reality because the forums do not feel like they get the eyeballs and attention they deserve. Post here and you get attention. Post there and you may not get, nor
    is it as organized so that the common issues bubble up.

  42. Chris says:

    I do not agree with you Matt. We have migrated from Exchange 2007 to 2013 on-prem. last year. Everything is running flawlessly while it was a complex deployment (2 CAS, 4MBS, 48DB and huge public folders)

  43. shijiesj says:

    When is the SP1 of Exchange 2013 released? early 2014=before 2015?

  44. shijiesj says:

    When is the SP1 of Exchange 2013 released? early 2014=before 2015?

  45. Please DO NOT KILL anonymous COMMENTS says:


  46. Excellent says:

    As expected, several people are unhappy with a much overdue change to the comments. Ridiculous comparisons of eliminating anonymous posts to "dictatorship" and "keep democracy". Yeah, that’s it. This is a professional blog about a professional product,
    not a chat room for kiddies. Grow up. Register for an account (you’re an IT pro, right? Why are you not already registered?) and post away. What you’re really annoyed with is that you won’t have anonymity to post unprofessional bashing that is blown out of
    proportion to reality. I’m off to register for my account now. Oh, the inconvenience and horror! Thank you, MS Exchange Team for improving this forum.

  47. Messaging Engineer says:

    ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ Give Ex2013 SP1

  48. Spammer use Technet profiles says:

    On a constant basis spammers will sign up for technet accounts and spam the forums. How will this help to cut down on spammers on your blog when they are gaming the system now and signing up for Technet profiles?

  49. Gizzle says:

    If not having to clean up "spam" gets your asses in gear with SP1 go for it already. heck dont even wait til march 1, release sp1 march 1

  50. GoodbyeAnonymousComments! says:

    For everyone complaining about not being able to post anonymously, let me ask you a question. Don’t you already have a free TechNet account now that you use to log on to the forums to post questions (and hopefully answers)? If not then you should be ashamed
    of yourselves and not be able to call yourself Exchange server admins. The forums should be the first place you go to post questions or get assistance with issues, not on the Exchange team blog site where the posts are about specific issues. If you do comment
    topically on the posts then creating a TechNet logon, assuming you don’t have one already, shouldn’t be an issue because again that’s what you are required to do for the TechNet forums. I.E. Commenting on this blog will have the same requirement as using the
    forums which is more than fair. Those of you who just want to use anonymous comments to take pot shots at Microsoft or the Exchange team because you are either unhappy with them or the direction they are taking, man (or woman) up and at least be willing to
    let people know who you are if you are going to make negative comments. Otherwise then you are just displaying "keyboard courage" which is just sad. Thank you Exchange team for taking an action to help clean these conversations up and to keep the comments
    hopefully more topical to the posts!

  51. GoodbyeAnonymousComments! says:

    And goodbye anonymous comments losing line breaks which make a well formatted post one giant paragraph. LOL!

  52. how_to_be_anonymous_here_in_the_future says:

    1. Create a account with Anonymous name. 2. Login here and continue to be anonymous. 3. Enjoy :-)

  53. O365 could be an option says:

    I’m just glad that You did not decide to require an Office 365 Account for participating in this blog :-) I’m not against disabling anonymous commenting, but this won’t improve anything in the on-premise world if you’re still focusing on selling O365 without
    respecting on-premise customers and their needs. Beside security discussions, at MS I would focus on an easy way to integrate Online Services, e.g. Exchange Online, into existing on-premise environments without the need of installing ADFS-Servers, Loadbalancers
    etc. which just adds complexity, error-proneness and costs. In my opinion Online Services should be as "easy" to integrate into on-premises environments as on-premise systems.

  54. Jack says:

    Public Cloud / Office 365 is infested with Security Issues, (NSA, Backdoor Access)…………and the worst is Vendor has your Data :D

  55. Magi Lee says:

    Why would my uverse bill say I am getting a discount for being a Microsoft employee? Could that tie into the mystery of the IGMP page, that no one at our IP could explain? It shows us as ‘hosting’? I am very concerned that there are things going on that
    I am not aware of…. and it is MY NAME on the bill!!! I keep seeing some files and such that are concerning me… could someone please contact me or let me know whom to contact? Thank you so very much!

  56. Messaging Engineer says:

    ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ Give Ex2013 SP1

  57. AllUrRoutersRBelongToUs says:

    I guess Jack and others are confident the NSA, foreign nations, you name it… don’t have backdoors in routing/switching equipment so on-premises must always be impregnable and on-the-wire traffic never tapped/decrypted. The changes are welcome and I look
    forward to more emphasis on Exchange content and less senseless sensationalist commentary!

  58. carl says:

    The fact is On-Premises I have my Data & in the Public Cloud the Vendor has my Data…………….which one I trust more……….of course On-Premises…………..Public Cloud have many Security issues…………..

  59. nick says:

    @AllUrRoutersRBelongToUs – The point of the Public Cloud / Office 365 is to have ALL these different companies Data in ONE centralized place so it would be easy to utilize the "Backdoor Access"………. :-)

  60. pesospesos says:

    If I use the "Sign in" button at the top of the page and sign in with my TechNet credentials, then I get redirected to a blank blog page that just says "home" every time I try to go to the exchange team blog. If I sign out, it works fine…

Comments are closed.

Skip to main content